Filters

1983 - 1989242000 - 201015
Reset filters

Settings

Subject: Urban development ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 39
  • ItemRestricted
    Development of a City Olongapo: a case study
    (1984-01) Caguiat, Jennifer P.; Villanueva, Maria Teresita A.
  • ItemRestricted
    A theoritical and empirical analysis of the incidence of urban property taxation
    (1986-03-24) Azarcon, Judith R.; Briones, Nemesio R.; Diokno, Benjamin
  • ItemRestricted
    The socio-economic aspects of urban housing in Metro Manila
    (1987-02-27) Acosta, Cynthia V.; Moreno, Honorata A.
  • ItemRestricted
    The Philippine construction industry: focus on housing and employment
    (1987-03) Jimenez, Froilan T.; Salveron, Glorivic Maite Y.; Castro, Amado A.
  • ItemRestricted
    Quality of life index: Metro Manila cities and municipalities
    (2002-03) Arrobang, Lawrence S.; De Pano, Amylex Marie R.
    Focusing particularly in the Metro Manila area, where the central commercial transactions take place, a Quality of Life Index (QLI) will be used to quantify the livability condition of the city or municipality. An index with four main variables will be used: Quality of Air, Human Well-being, Decent Standard of Living, and Sanitation. Included in the study are the following: Manila, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, Quezon City, Caloocan, Makati, Pasay San Juan, Malabon, Navotas, Muntinlupa and Pateros. To avoid misinterpretations, the research will have its attention on vital years 1985,1988,1991,1994,1997 only. As it turned out, the best place to live in when you value sanitation the most is Las Pinas. Also highly recommended are the cities of Muntinlupa, Paranaque, Pasay and San Juan. Regarding material wealth, the most strategic place is Makati City. Unexpectedly, Manila has one of the lowest index values along with Caloocan and Malabon. Top performers in the Human Well-being Index are San Juan, Mandaluyong and Makati. Meanwhile, Navotas is consistently the lowest ranked. If you are prone to respiratory diseases, you should as much as possible stay away from Valenzuela and certain areas of Quezon City particularly Quezon Avenue and EDSA. On the other hand, highly suggested are the cities of Las Pinas and Pasig. Taken as a whole, Makati, San Juan, Paranaque and Quezon City are the most livable places in Metro Manila. This reflects that these urban areas have the greatest potential for a sustainable development.
  • ItemRestricted
    The political economy of infrastructure investment allocation in the Philippines: an empirical consideration of selected provinces
    (2002-10) Samson, Alvin Rae; Virtucio, Aristotle; Mendoza, Nimfa
    This study develops a model of infrastructure investment allocation that suits the political economy setting in the Philippines. A linear production function established a highly' significant elastic relationship between output and infrastructure investments. The study also puts forth a specification for policy-making in order to capture the factors that influence investment decisions. An investment function suggests that political considerations primarily affect the allocation of funds for national roads across provinces.
  • ItemRestricted
    Lessons learned from the financing of EDSA MRT 3 under a BLT payment scheme
    (2002-10) Tolentino, Jade Joy Therese C.; Bachoco, Jose B. II; Bautista, Socorro Gochoco
    This paper investigates the financial design in the carrying out of MRT Line-3, a BLT project whose risks are all transferred to the government. The research study reviews the financial planning aspects of the project and inspects the current financial condition of the MRT system. By examining financial projections for MRT, the paper brings to light the amount of financing role the government provides to sustain MRT's operations and viability. The bleak financial picture that all these will offer will justify the need to identify blunders from the past, and the corresponding lessons that may be valuable to the government in the funding of future mass transits.
  • ItemRestricted
    Analyzing the effects of investments in public infrastructure on regional poverty reduction
    (2006-04-10) Aruta, Joseph Ricardo; De Guzman, Rodette Bon; Arcenas, Agustin
    Poverty remains to be one of the most pressing issues of the Philippine society. The government has resorted to different means in order to combat this problem, such as providing sources of income, shelter and healthcare. But one of the less visible ways by which the government attempts to reduce poverty is through its investments in public infrastructures, specifically in roads, electricity, education, irrigation and the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program. These infrastructures have both its direct effects on poverty alleviation, and indirect effects because it goes through certain channels, namely wages, agricultural employment and non-agricultural, which then have impacts on poverty. The aim of this study is to measure just how significant the investments of the government in these infrastructures are on regional poverty reduction. Data from 1990 to 2005 on the amount of government expenditure on these infrastructures were gathered and regressed against poverty incidence and the channels. Regression results show that government spending on roads has the largest direct effect on poverty reduction. Both education and electricity have the largest indirect impact on improving the welfare of the poor through its effects on the three channels mentioned above. These results suggest that the government should be wiser in deciding where to allocate resources if its main objective is to lift people out of poverty. It should be more flexible in imposing policies and ensure that the benefits are felt by the people.
  • ItemRestricted
  • ItemRestricted